These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: UK Renal Registry 12th Annual Report (December 2009): chapter 15: clinical, haematological and biochemical parameters in patients receiving renal replacement therapy in paediatric centres in the UK in 2008: national and centre-specific analyses.
    Author: Hussain F, Castledine C, van Schalkwyk D, Sinha MD, Lewis M, Inward C.
    Journal: Nephron Clin Pract; 2010; 115 Suppl 1():c289-308. PubMed ID: 20413953.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: The British Association for Paediatric Nephrology Registry was established thirteen years ago to analyse data related to renal replacement therapy for children. The registry receives data from the 13 paediatric nephrology centres in the UK. In 2008 the registry was relocated to the UK Renal Registry (UKRR). AIM: To provide centre specific data so that individual centres can reflect on the contribution that their data makes to the national picture and to determine the extent to which their patient parameters meet nationally agreed audit standards for the management of children with established renal failure. METHOD: Data were submitted to the UKRR for analysis electronically via renal IT systems from 5 centres and on paper-based returns from the remaining centres. Data were analysed to calculate summary statistics and where applicable the percentage achieving an audit standard. The standards used were those set out by the Renal Association and the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. RESULTS: Data were received from all but one centre. Anthropometric data confirmed that children with ERF in the UK are short compared with their peers with no change in recent trends. In the UK as a whole, the control of blood pressure, anaemia and bone biochemistry is suboptimal, but for some parameters these appear to be better in the 2008 cohort than in the 1999-2008 cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Key features of this report are the provision of centre specific data and comparison of data to audit standards. It is hoped that this information will provide a basis for discussion and a stimulus to improve the care of children with ERF.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]