These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Shear bond strength of luting agents to fixed prosthodontic restorative core materials.
    Author: Capa N, Ozkurt Z, Canpolat C, Kazazoglu E.
    Journal: Aust Dent J; 2009 Dec; 54(4):334-40. PubMed ID: 20415932.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Bonding properties of luting cements are important for retention of restorative core materials. The aim of this study was to compare the bonding performance of a resin-modified glass ionomer cement and a self-adhesive resin cement to various fixed prosthodontic core materials. METHODS: Cylindrical specimens with a thickness of 2 mm and a diameter of 5 mm were fabricated from Au-Pd-Ag, Co-Cr, Ni-Cr-Mo, Ni-Cr-Fe alloys, titanium, zirconia and Empress II (n = 20). Each group was divided into two subgroups to be luted with two different luting agents. Composite resin blocks were cemented onto specimens with RelyXUnicem and FujiCem. A shear bond strength machine with 50 kg load cell and 0.50 mm/min crosshead speed was used. Kruskal Wallis test, Dunn's Multiple Range test and Mann-Whitney-U test were used for statistical analysis. The results were evaluated in a confidence interval of p < 0.05. RESULTS: The highest bond strength was obtained between Ni-Cr-Fe-RelyXUnicem (8.22 +/- 2.15 MPa) and the lowest was between Empress II-FujiCem (1.48 +/- 0.9 MPa). In FujiCem groups, Co-Cr and Ni-Cr-Fe showed significantly higher bond strength than Au-Pd-Ag and Empress II. In RelyX Unicem groups, Ni-Cr-Fe showed higher bond strength than Empress II. CONCLUSIONS: The types of luting agents and restorative core materials may have a significant influence on bond strength.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]