These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Non-invasive assessment of systolic left ventricular function in systemic sclerosis.
    Author: Kazzam E, Caidahl K, Hällgren R, Gustafsson R, Landelius J, Waldenström A.
    Journal: Eur Heart J; 1991 Feb; 12(2):151-6. PubMed ID: 2044548.
    Abstract:
    Systemic sclerosis is a multisystemic disorder, also affecting the heart. To evaluate its influence on systolic left ventricular (LV) function, we investigated 30 consecutive patients (age 54.5 +/- 2.4 years, 15 men and 15 women) and 48 controls matched for age and sex. All subjects were investigated by phonocardiography, pulse curve recordings, M-mode echocardiography, and by pulsed and continuous wave Doppler. Heart rate, blood pressure and peripheral resistance did not differ, but patients weighed less than controls (P less than 0.01). Systolic time intervals indicated systolic impairment, with an increased pre-ejection period to LV ejection time (LVET) ratio (0.37 +/- 0.02 vs 0.30 +/- 0.01 P less than 0.001), and also an increased isovolumic contraction time to LVET ratio (0.17 +/- 0.02 vs 0.12 +/- 0.01, P less than 0.02). The latter difference remained when LVET was adjusted for heart rate. Echocardiographic E-point to septal separation was increased in patients (8.3 +/- 1.3 vs 4.8 +/- 0.3 mm, P = 0.001), also after adjustment for LV dimension (P = 0.0001), while septal fractional thickening was decreased (P less than 0.01). End systolic wall stress (P = 0.0002) and stress to volume ratio (P = 0.03) were lower in systemic sclerosis. Peak LV emptying rate was also lower in the patient group when measured by echocardiography (P = 0.03). There was no difference between groups regarding LV dimensions, fractional shortening or mean velocity of circumferential fibre shortening. While aortic Doppler peak emptying rate did not differ between groups, it occurred later in systole in the patient group (P less than 0.01) as did peak velocity (P = 0.0001).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]