These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Role of FDG-PET in the evaluation and staging of hepatocellular carcinoma with comparison of tumor size, AFP level, and histologic grade.
    Author: Wolfort RM, Papillion PW, Turnage RH, Lillien DL, Ramaswamy MR, Zibari GB.
    Journal: Int Surg; 2010; 95(1):67-75. PubMed ID: 20480845.
    Abstract:
    Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) has proven to be a valuable tool in the initial diagnosis, staging, and restaging of a variety of cancers. The potential use of FDG-PET in the evaluation and management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) continues to evolve. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of FDG-PET for the detection and staging of HCC. In addition, we also assessed the correlation between FDG-PET positivity, tumor size, a-fetal protein level (AFP), and histologic grade. All patients on the hepatobiliary and liver transplant service with biopsy proven HCC that underwent FDG-PET between January 2000 and December 2004 were selected for a retrospective review. Results of the FDG-PET scan were compared with other imaging studies [computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), ultrasonography], intraoperative findings, tumor size, AFP levels, and histologic grade. Of the 20 patients who underwent 18F-FDG PET, increased FDG uptake was noted in 14 scans (70%). These 20 patients fell into 2 groups: 1 for detecting HCC (Group A) and 1 for staging HCC (Group B). There were 7 patients in Group A; only 2 scans (28.6%) showed increased uptake. There were 13 patients in Group B; 12 scans (92.3%) showed increased uptake. In Group B, 11 of the 13 scans (84.6%) provided an accurate representation of the disease process. Two scans failed to accurately portray the disease; one scan failed to show any increase in uptake, and the other scan failed to detect positive nodes that were found during surgery. FDG-PET detected only 2 of 8 tumors (25%) < or = 5 cm in size. All 12 PET scans (100%) in tumors > or = 5 cm and/or multiple in number were detected by FDG-PET. FDG-PET scans with AFP levels < 100 ng/ml were positive in 5 of 9 patients (55.6%). In patients with levels > 100 ng/ml, 6 of 7 patients (85.7%) had positive scans. Histologically, there were 6 well-differentiated, 6 moderately differentiated, and 2 poorly differentiated HCCs. FDG-PET detected 4 of 6 for both well- and moderately differentiated HCCs. Both poorly differentiated HCCs were detected. The intensity was evenly distributed between the different histologic grades. There was a strong correlation of FDG uptake with tumor size. There were 5 HCCs with primary tumors >10 cm in size; 4 showed intense uptake on the scan. In contrast, of the 8 tumors < or = 5 cm in size, 6 were negative for uptake. The sensitivity of FDG-PET in detecting HCC < or = 5 cm in size is low and therefore may not be helpful in detecting all of these tumors. For larger tumors, there is a strong correlation of sensitivity and uptake intensity with tumor size and elevated AFP levels. FDG-PET sensitivity and uptake intensity did not correlate with histologic grade. In the setting of extrahepatic disease, FDG-PET seems to be an effective accurate method for HCC staging; however, whether PET offers any benefit over traditional imaging has yet to be determined.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]