These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Conversion to rapamycin immunosuppression for malignancy after kidney transplantation.
    Author: Manuelli M, De Luca L, Iaria G, Tatangelo P, Sforza D, Perrone L, Bellini MI, Angelico R, Anselmo A, Tisone G.
    Journal: Transplant Proc; 2010 May; 42(4):1314-6. PubMed ID: 20534289.
    Abstract:
    INTRODUCTION: Malignancies are a well-known complication of immunosuppressive therapy among renal transplant recipients, representing an important cause of long-term morbidity and mortality. Rapamycin has been shown to limit the proliferation of a number of malignant cell lines in vivo and in vitro. METHODS: Fifteen patients developed the following malignancies at a mean of 90.3 months (range = 10-252) after kidney transplantation: metastatic gastric cancer (n = 1), metastatic colon cancer (n = 1), bilateral nephrourothelioma (n = 1), skin cancer (n = 2), Kaposi's sarcoma (n = 2), posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD; n = 4), renal cell carcinoma T1 (n = 1), MALT lymphoma (n = 1), intramucous colon carcinoma (n = 1), liposarcoma of the spermatic cord (n = 1). After the diagnosis of malignancy, the patients were switched from calcineurin inhibitor-based immunosuppression to rapamycin (monotherapy, n = 3), or associated with steroids (n = 6) or with mycophenolate mofetil (n = 6). RESULTS: Both patients with metastatic cancer underwent chemotherapy but succumbed after 6 and 13 months. Two patients with PTLD who underwent chemotherapy died after 12 and 36 months. At a mean follow-up of 32.7 months (range = 7-56), the remaining 11 patients are cancer-free. Two patients lost their grafts after 24 and 36 months after the switch due to chronic rejection. Renal graft function remained stable in all other patients from diagnosis throughout follow-up. CONCLUSION: Our observations suggested that rapamycin-based immunosuppression offers the possibility for regression of nonmetastatic tumors. Nevertheless, it is difficult to assess whether tumor regression was due to rapamycin treatment or to the reduced immunosuppression.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]