These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Fasting plasma glucose and Type 2 diabetes risk: a non-linear relationship.
    Author: Schulze MB, Fritsche A, Boeing H, Joost HG.
    Journal: Diabet Med; 2010 Apr; 27(4):473-6. PubMed ID: 20536521.
    Abstract:
    AIMS: The current definition of impaired fasting glucose (IFG, >or=100 mg/dl) has been criticized as being too low for selective identification of individuals at risk for Type 2 diabetes. Furthermore, it is unclear whether any cut-off is justifiable from the shape of association between fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and diabetes. We therefore evaluated the association between FPG and incidence of Type 2 diabetes in a prospective, population-based study. METHODS: A case-cohort study within the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC)-Potsdam cohort study involved 589 fasted participants in a randomly selected subcohort and 153 incident cases. Restricted cubic spline regression was used to examine non-linearity of associations and we calculated pairs of sensitivities and specificities for different cut-offs of FPG. RESULTS: Spline regression with adjustment for age, sex, body mass index, waist circumference, education, physical activity, alcohol consumption, and plasma levels of triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and gamma-glutamyltransferase indicated that FPG was associated with risk in a non-linear fashion. Risk with higher FPG increased only above approximately 84 mg/dl. FPG>or=84 mg/dl yielded a sensitivity of 95.4% at a false-positive rate of 86.8%. In comparison, FPG>or=100 and>or=110 mg/dl yielded sensitivities of 78.4 and 42.5% and false-positive rates of 27.8 and 6.8%, respectively. The optimal cut-off of FPG was at approximately 102 mg/dl (sensitivity: 75.8%, false-positive rate: 20.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Although our study suggests a threshold for increasing diabetes risk at 84 mg/dl, this cut-off would classify the vast majority of the population as at risk. The statistically optimal cut-off supports the current definition of IFG (>or=100 mg/dl).
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]