These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Comparison of olopatadin and ketotifen in the treatment of allergic conjunctivitis].
    Author: Varguez-Rodríguez ME, Hernández-López A, Gómez-Dávila Rde L.
    Journal: Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc; 2009; 47(4):399-404. PubMed ID: 20553645.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of olopatadine 0.1 % and ketotifen 0.025 % ophthalmic solutions in the treatment of allergic conjunctivitis. METHODS: Forty patients with allergic conjunctivitis were included in the study, they were randomized in two groups: G-I (n = 20) olopatadine 0.1 % and G-II (n = 20) ketotifen 0.025 %, both receiving one drop every 12 hours. We evaluated itching, burning, tearing, redness and chemosis previously and 30 minutes, one, two and four week after. RESULTS: Age G-I was 19.7 +/- 6.7 years; G-II, 21.05 +/- 8.3 years. When evaluating itching, olopatadine had a significant improvement at 30 minutes and after one week (p < 0.05). In the following weeks, the results were similar in both groups. Olopatadine showed significant improvement in burning at 30 minutes, one and two week (p < 0.05). Tearing significantly decreased at 30 minutes with olopatadine (p < 0.05). There was no difference in redness or chemosis improvement in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, olopatadine 0.1 % was more effective than topical ketotifen 0.025 % in improving itching, tearing and burning in allergic conjunctivitis patients.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]