These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Comparison of label-free biosensing in microplate, microfluidic, and spot-based affinity capture assays.
    Author: Choi CJ, Belobraydich AR, Chan LL, Mathias PC, Cunningham BT.
    Journal: Anal Biochem; 2010 Oct 01; 405(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 20553867.
    Abstract:
    Using both experimental assays and fluid-dynamic finite element simulation models, we directly compared the achievable performance limits of four distinct assay configurations for label-free detection of an analyte from a test sample on a biosensor surface. The assay configurations studied in this work included a biosensor incorporated into the bottom surface of a microplate well and a microfluidic channel. For each configuration, we compared assay performance for the scenario in which the entire bottom surface of the fluid-handling vessel is coated with capture ligands with assay performance for the scenario in which the capture ligands are applied in the form of localized spots. As a model system, we used detection of the protein biomarker tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) using immobilized TNF-alpha capture antibody. Results show that the microfluidic assay format dramatically reduces the time required to establish a stable equilibrium. Spot-based assays are advantageous for microplate-based detection for reducing the time required for equilibrium sensor response. The results derived are generally applicable to any label-free biosensor technology and any ligand-analyte system with adjustable variables that include sensor mass density sensitivity, analyte-ligand adsorption/desorption rate constants, immobilized ligand density, flow channel geometry, flow rate, and spot size.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]