These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Changes in temporomandibular joint disc position and form following Herbst and fixed orthodontic treatment.
    Author: Aidar LA, Dominguez GC, Yamashita HK, Abrahão M.
    Journal: Angle Orthod; 2010 Sep; 80(5):843-52. PubMed ID: 20578854.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: To determine the changes in the position and form of the temporomandibular joint articular disc in adolescents with Class II division 1 malocclusion and mandibular retrognathism treated with the Herbst appliance (phase I) and fixed orthodontic appliance (phase II). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-two consecutive adolescents went through phase I of treatment and 23 completed phase II. The temporomandibular joints were evaluated qualitatively by means of magnetic resonance images at the beginning of treatment (T1), during phase I (T2), at the end of phase I (T3), and at the end of phase II (T4). RESULTS: Significant changes in disc position were not observed with the mouth closed between T1 x T3 (P = .317), T3 x T4 (P = .287), or T1 x T4 (P = .261). At T2, on average, the disc was positioned regressively. With the mouth open, no difference was observed between T1 x T3 (P = .223) or T1 x T4 (P = .082). We did observe a significant difference between T3 x T4 (P < .05). Significant changes in the disc form were found with the mouth closed between T1 x T2 (P < .001) and T2 x T3 (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: At the end of the two-phase treatment, in general terms, the position and form of the initial articular discs were maintained; however, in some temporomandibular joints some seemingly adverse effects were observed at T4.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]