These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Correlation between glycolytic phenotype and tumor grade in soft-tissue sarcomas by 18F-FDG PET.
    Author: Benz MR, Dry SM, Eilber FC, Allen-Auerbach MS, Tap WD, Elashoff D, Phelps ME, Czernin J.
    Journal: J Nucl Med; 2010 Aug; 51(8):1174-81. PubMed ID: 20660389.
    Abstract:
    UNLABELLED: Tumor glycolytic phenotyping can be accomplished with (18)F-FDG PET. Tumor (18)F-FDG uptake correlates with tumor grade in several cancers. However, the role of (18)F-FDG PET for the grading of soft-tissue sarcomas (STSs) warrants further research. METHODS: One hundred two patients (48 men and 54 women; mean age +/- SD, 50 +/- 17 y) with 12 STS subtypes underwent (18)F-FDG PET/CT before treatment. Tumor (18)F-FDG uptake, expressed as maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), was compared among subtypes and correlated with histopathologic grade. Two frequently used sarcoma grading systems--the 3-tier system of the French Federation of Cancer Centers Sarcoma Group (Fédération Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer [FNCLCC]) and a 2-tier system (low grade vs. high grade)--were used. RESULTS: More than 90% of STSs (93/102) exhibited a strong glycolytic phenotype (SUVmax, 2.7-52.2 g/mL). Tumor SUVmax differed significantly among tumor grades (P < 0.001 for the 3- and 2-tier grading systems). The FNCLCC and 2-tier grading systems predicted tumor grade with similar accuracy (area under the curve, 0.83 and 0.85, respectively; P = 0.35). SUVmax differed significantly among histologic subtypes (P = 0.03) in the entire population but not when high-grade STSs were analyzed separately (P = 0.31). CONCLUSION: The tumor glycolytic phenotype correlated significantly with histologic grade as determined by both the FNCLCC and 2-tier (high vs. low) grading systems. (18)F-FDG PET cannot be used to reliably distinguish among grade 2 and 3 STSs (by FNCLCC) and the various subtypes.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]