These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Systolic time intervals as simple echocardiographic parameters of left ventricular systolic performance: correlation with ejection fraction and longitudinal two-dimensional strain.
    Author: Reant P, Dijos M, Donal E, Mignot A, Ritter P, Bordachar P, Dos Santos P, Leclercq C, Roudaut R, Habib G, Lafitte S.
    Journal: Eur J Echocardiogr; 2010 Dec; 11(10):834-44. PubMed ID: 20660604.
    Abstract:
    AIMS: Conventionally, the evaluation of left ventricular (LV) systolic function is based on ejection fraction assessment, which may be supplemented by other echocardiographic techniques, such as tissue Doppler imaging, 3D evaluation, and speckle tracking strains. However, these imaging modalities have a high technicity and are time-consuming, while being associated with reproducibility limitations. In this context, the usefulness of simpler measurements such as systolic time intervals (STI) by pulsed Doppler echocardiography must be emphasized. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this multicentre study, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), dP/dt(max), LV stroke volume, myocardial longitudinal deformation, aortic pre-ejectional period (PEP, ms), and left ventricular ejection time (LVET, ms) were prospectively investigated and compared in 134 consecutive heart failure (HF) patients and 43 control subjects. Feasibility of STI measurements was 100%. Intra-observer reproducibility was 98% for PEP, 96% for LVET, 87% for LVEF, and 93% for global longitudinal strain (GLS). By subgroup analyses, with increasingly altered LVEF or GLS, PEP significantly increased, whereas significantly LVET decreased, resulting in a significantly increased PEP/LVET ratio (P < 0.001). In the HF patients group, a correlation between LVEF and PEP/LVET was found, with r = 0.55 (y = -0.0083x + 0.75, P < 0.001). Based on receiver operating curve analyses, the area under the curve was 0.91 for PEP/LVET > 0.43, which allowed us to detect LVEF < 35% with a sensitivity of 87%, and a specificity of 84%. CONCLUSION: STI can be easily and accurately measured in clinical practice, and may be used for detecting alterations in LV systolic function. Moreover, this method is likely to have potential applications in the management of HF patients.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]