These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Using appendicitis scores in the pediatric ED.
    Author: Mandeville K, Pottker T, Bulloch B, Liu J.
    Journal: Am J Emerg Med; 2011 Nov; 29(9):972-7. PubMed ID: 20674221.
    Abstract:
    STUDY OBJECTIVE: The aims of the study were to prospectively evaluate the Alvarado and Samuel (pediatric appendicitis score [PAS]) appendicitis scoring systems in children and determine performance based on sex. METHODS: Children with abdominal pain concerning for appendicitis were recruited. Nine parameters evaluated by the scores were documented before imaging/surgery consultation. Test characteristics were calculated on all patients and by sex. RESULTS: Two hundred eighty-seven patients enrolled; median age was 9.8 years; and 155 (54%) were diagnosed with pathologic examination-confirmed appendicitis. Patients with appendicitis had mean PAS of 7.6, and those without had mean of 5.6 (P < .001). Patients with appendicitis had a mean Alvarado of 7.2, and those without had a mean of 5.2 (P < .001). In appendicitis patients, PAS cutoff of 6 or greater would give 137 correct diagnoses; sensitivity, 88%; specificity, 50%; and positive predictive value (PPV), 67%. An Alvarado cutoff of 7 or greater would give 118 correct diagnoses; sensitivity, 76%; specificity, 72%; and PPV, 76%. Both performed better in males than females. CONCLUSION: Regardless of sex, neither PAS nor Alvarado has adequate predictive values for sole use to diagnose appendicitis.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]