These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Low frequency of CXCR4-using viruses in patients at the time of primary non-subtype-B HIV-1 infection.
    Author: Frange P, Chaix ML, Raymond S, Galimand J, Deveau C, Meyer L, Goujard C, Rouzioux C, Izopet J, French ANRS CO 06 PRIMO Cohort Study Group.
    Journal: J Clin Microbiol; 2010 Oct; 48(10):3487-91. PubMed ID: 20686090.
    Abstract:
    We used genotypic and phenotypic assays to estimate the frequency of X4/DM viruses in 131 patients infected with non-subtype-B viruses at the time of primary HIV-1 infection (PHI). All patients were enrolled in the French PRIMO Cohort from 1996 to 2007. Most strains belonged to CRF02_AG (51.1%) and subtype A (14.5%). Sixteen viruses (12.2%) were classified as CXCR4 tropic ("X4 strains") by the combined criteria of amino acids 11 and 25 of the V3 loop (11/25) and net charge rules and/or the SVMgeno2pheno(10%) algorithm: 6 strains by the combined genotypic rule, 7 by the SVMgeno2pheno(10%) algorithm, and 3, clustering in subtype D, by both algorithms. However, only one strain (0.8%), belonging to subtype A, was defined as a dual-tropic (DM) virus by the phenotypic assay. The 67 CRF02_AG strains included 2 classified as X4 strains by the combined genotypic rule (3%) and 2 others classified as X4 strains by SVMgeno2pheno(10%) (3%), but none of these 4 strains was an X4 or DM strain according to the phenotypic assay. These results suggest that the cellular virus reservoir was established with X4 strains in very few non-subtype-B-infected patients at the time of PHI. Genotypic predictions can overestimate the proportion of non-subtype-B X4 viruses at PHI.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]