These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Alternative methods of normalising EMG during cycling.
    Author: Albertus-Kajee Y, Tucker R, Derman W, Lambert M.
    Journal: J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2010 Dec; 20(6):1036-43. PubMed ID: 20696597.
    Abstract:
    We evaluated possible methods of normalisation for EMG measured during cycling. The MVC method, Sprint method and 70% Peak Power Output Method were investigated and their repeatability, reliability and sensitivity to change in workload were compared. Thirteen cyclists performed the same experimental protocol on three separate occasions. Each day, subjects firstly performed MVCs, followed by a 10s maximal sprint on a cycle ergometer. Subjects then performed a Peak Power Output (PPO) test until exhaustion. After which they cycled at 70% of PPO for 5 min at 90 rpm. Results indicated that normalising EMG data to 70% PPO is more repeatable, the intra-class correlation (ICC) of 70% PPO (0.87) was significantly higher than for MVC (0.66) (p=0.03) and 10s sprint (0.65) (p=0.04). The 70% PPO method also demonstrated the least intra-subject variability for five out of the six muscles. The Sprint and 70% PPO method highlighted greater sensitivity to changes in muscle activity than the MVC method. The MVC method showed the highest intra-subject variability for most muscles except VM. The data suggests that normalising EMG to dynamic methods is the most appropriate for examining muscle activity during cycling over different days and for once-off measurements.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]