These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Auditory frequency focusing is very rapid.
    Author: Reeves A, Scharf B.
    Journal: J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Aug; 128(2):795-803. PubMed ID: 20707449.
    Abstract:
    The present experiments examine the effect of a weak 40-ms tone burst (cue) on the detection of a closely following 40-ms signal at the same frequency. Detection becomes more difficult as the temporal separation (onset to onset) between them shortens from around 300 ms to under 52 ms. The threshold increase or proximal interference is similar whether signal frequency is constant from trial to trial--frequency certainty--or changing--frequency uncertainty. The increase is also similar whether the cue goes to the same ear as the signal or to the opposite ear. This contralateral interference by such weak cues, only 4 dB SL against a continuous broadband noise, appears to exclude a role for forward masking by the cues. When the preceding tone burst differs in frequency from the signal, threshold increases little at any temporal separation. Combined with earlier results on frequency uncertainty (Scharf, B., et al., 2007, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 121, 2149-2157), the present results show that a listener can shift focusing to an unexpected signal frequency in less than 52 ms. However, the rapidity of focusing is usually obscured by proximal interference, which possibly occurs whenever cue and signal share the same period (approximately 200 ms) of temporal integration.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]