These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Functional profile of the isolated uremic nephron. Impaired water permeability and adenylate cyclase responsiveness of the cortical collecting tubule to vasopressin.
    Author: Fine LG, Schlondorff D, Trizna W, Gilbert RM, Bricker NS.
    Journal: J Clin Invest; 1978 Jun; 61(6):1519-27. PubMed ID: 207738.
    Abstract:
    Resistance of the chronically diseased kidney to vasopressin has been proposed as a possible explanation for the urinary concentrating defect of uremia. The present studies examined the water permeability and adenylate cyclase responsiveness of isolated cortical collecting tubules (CCT) from remnant kidneys of uremic rabbits to vasopressin. In the absence of vasopressin the CCTs of both normal and uremic rabbits were impermeable to water. At the same osmotic gradient, addition of a supramaximal concentration of vasopressin to the peritubular bathing medium led to a significantly lower net water flux per unit length (and per unit luminal surface area) in uremic CCTs than in normal CCTs. Transepithelial osmotic water permeability coefficient, P(f), was 0.0232 +/-0.0043 cm/s in normal CCTs and 0.0059+/-0.001 cm/s in uremic CCTs (P < 0.001). The impaired vasopressin responsiveness of the uremic CCTs was observed whether normal or uremic serum was present in the bath. Basal adenylate cyclase activity per microgram protein was comparable in normal and uremic CCTs. Stimulation by NaF led to equivalent levels of activity in both, whereas vasopressin-stimulated activity was 50% lower in the uremic than in the normal CCTs (P < 0.025). The cyclic AMP analogue, 8-bromo cyclic AMP, produced an increase in the P(f) of normal CCTs closely comparable to that observed with vasopressin. In contrast, the P(f) of uremic CCTs was only minimally increased by this analogue and was not further stimulated by theophylline. These studies demonstrate an impaired responsiveness of the uremic CCT to vasopressin. This functional defect appears to be a result, at least in part, of a blunted responsiveness of adenylate cyclase to vasopressin. The data further suggest that an additional defect in the cellular response to vasopressin may exist, involving a step (or steps) subsequent to the formation of cyclic AMP.A unifying concept of the urinary concentrating defect of uremia is proposed which incorporates a number of hitherto unexplained observations on the concentrating and diluting functions of the diseased kidney.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]