These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Physiological and transcriptional studies of Cr(VI) reduction under aerobic and denitrifying conditions by an aquifer-derived pseudomonad. Author: Han R, Geller JT, Yang L, Brodie EL, Chakraborty R, Larsen JT, Beller HR. Journal: Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Oct 01; 44(19):7491-7. PubMed ID: 20822129. Abstract: Cr(VI) is a widespread groundwater contaminant that is a potent toxin, mutagen, and carcinogen. In situ reductive immobilization is a favored approach for Cr(VI) bioremediation, and Cr(VI) reduction has been reported in a variety of aerobic, facultative, and anaerobic bacteria, including a number of pseudomonads. However, studies comparing Cr(VI) reduction under aerobic and denitrifying conditions in the same organism are not available. We have conducted studies with strain RCH2, a bacterium similar to Pseudomonas stutzeri that we isolated from a Cr-contaminated aquifer. Cell suspension studies with lactate demonstrated that Cr(VI) reduction could occur under either denitrifying or aerobic conditions (at comparable specific rates) and that reduction was at least 20-fold more rapid when the terminal electron acceptor (i.e., nitrate or O(2)) was present. Our results suggest that Cr(VI) reduction by strain RCH2 under either aerobic or denitrifying conditions is primarily cometabolic in the sense that the physiological electron acceptor (oxygen or nitrate) appears to be required. Under both aerobic and denitrifying conditions, the gene(s) associated with chromate reduction are not inducible by Cr. Continuous culture (chemostat) studies showed strong correlations (r(2) values >0.93) between nitrate reduction rate and the transcript copy number of either nirS (cytochrome cd(1) nitrite reductase) or narG (nitrate reductase α subunit). As our studies indicate that anaerobic Cr(VI) reduction by this pseudomonad requires active denitrification and that denitrification and chromate reduction rates are highly correlated (r(2) > 0.99), monitoring expression of such denitrification genes in biostimulated aquifers could provide valuable proxy information for in situ chromate reduction by similar bacteria even if the specific genes involved in chromate reduction have not been identified. We also report incomplete removal of reduced Cr from solution and on artifacts in the widely used diphenylcarbazide assay for Cr(VI), most notably, its complete inactivation in the presence of millimolar nitrite.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]