These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Detection of human enterovirus and human parechovirus (HPeV) genotypes from clinical stool samples: polymerase chain reaction and direct molecular typing, culture characteristics, and serotyping.
    Author: Benschop K, Minnaar R, Koen G, van Eijk H, Dijkman K, Westerhuis B, Molenkamp R, Wolthers K.
    Journal: Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2010 Oct; 68(2):166-73. PubMed ID: 20846590.
    Abstract:
    Molecular (polymerase chain reaction [PCR]) methods are increasingly used to detect and type human enteroviruses (HEVs) and parechoviruses (HPeV). Here, we assessed their value in comparison to virus culture and serotyping for detection and typing of HEV and HPeV in stool samples from hospitalized patients. By use of real-time PCR, 221/1174 patients (18.8%) were found positive for HEV/HPeV. By cell culture, a virus could be isolated from 107 of the HEV/HPeV PCR-positive samples. Culture efficiency was correlated to the Ct value, (geno)type, and cell lines used. Of the HEV/HPeV PCR-positive samples, 47% could be genotyped by VP1 genotyping and 25% by serotyping. In conclusion, PCR detection of HEV/HPeV from stool is more sensitive than virus culture, particularly for coxsackieviruses A and HPeVs. However, the genotyping method used here could identify only 47% of the HEV/HPeV strains. Further optimization and validation of direct genotyping are needed, and clinical relevance of HEV/HPeV detection in stool needs to be determined.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]