These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Inter-individual variability of effect of 7 low molecular weight antithrombin-dependent anticoagulants studied in vitro with calibrated automated thrombography.
    Author: Hacquard M, Perrin J, Lelievre N, Vigneron C, Lecompte T.
    Journal: Thromb Res; 2011 Jan; 127(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 20850172.
    Abstract:
    INTRODUCTION: Low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) and fondaparinux are antithrombin dependent anticoagulant drugs considered to need no laboratory monitoring because of their reputedly predictable anticoagulant effect. However it has been suggested in the literature the existence of an inter-individual variability in response to LMWHs that would be not fully attributable to pharmacokinetics causes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In order to separate pharmacokinetic from pharmacodynamics effects we studied in 12 platelet-depleted plasmas from normal donors the inhibitory effect on TG determined with the CAT of added UFH, 5 LMWHs and 2 oligosaccharides with anti-Xa activity only. RESULTS: A concentration-dependent inhibition of thrombin generation was found with all molecules tested. The concentration-response relation was very different when the concentrations were expressed in anti-Xa unit but became very similar when expressed in anti-thrombin units regarding LMWHs. Most importantly, we noticed a large inter-individual variability of the inhibitory effects with all molecules tested, UFH and LMWHs alike. The IC40 value varied at least twofold between the highest and the lowest responder. For any given anti-Xa level of any heparin and of pentasaccharide the inhibition of the ETP showed scattering of around 25%. CONCLUSION: In contrast to what is generally assumed the inter-individual variation of the in vitro pharmacodynamics response is equally high for UFH and any LMWH (~25%) and even for the synthetic pentasaccharide. This questions the rationale for standard dosage, the more so as in clinical practice pharmacokinetic variation (e.g. due to body weight) will add to this pharmacodynamic variability.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]