These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: The revised digital transcutaneous PCO2/SpO2 ear sensor is a reliable noninvasive monitoring tool in patients after cardiac surgery.
    Author: Roediger R, Beck-Schimmer B, Theusinger OM, Rusch D, Seifert B, Spahn DR, Schmid ER, Baulig W.
    Journal: J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2011 Apr; 25(2):243-9. PubMed ID: 20851636.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to validate the revised SenTec V-Sign 2 sensor (SenTec AG, Therwil, Switzerland) for combined noninvasive continuous assessment of pulse rate, pulse oximetry (SpO(2)), and transcutaneous carbon dioxide tension (PtcCO(2)) in adults after cardiac surgery. DESIGN: A prospective clinical study. SETTING: A single-center university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty adult patients aged 36 to 84 years after cardiac surgery. INTERVENTIONS: SpO(2) and PtcCO(2) values of three V-Sign 2 sensors (SenTec AG) attached at the earlobe, forehead, and cheek and SpO(2) values of the Nellcor Durasensor (Model DS-100A; Nellcor Puritan Bennett Inc, Pleasanton, CA) were compared with simultaneous measurements of blood gases and end-expiratory carbon dioxide. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Measurements were performed during periods of hyper-, normo-, and hypocapnia and then at 30-minute intervals up to 5 hours. Bland-Altman analysis and simple regression analysis were used. RESULTS: The detection failures for PtcCO(2) were 0.3% to 1.3%, for SpO(2) 10% to 25%, and for pulse rate 5% to 10%. The V-Sign 2 earlobe sensor provided the best results. The mean bias and limits of agreement for PtcCO(2ear) and PaCO(2) were 1.1 and -3.4/+5.5 mmHg. The drift of PtcCO(2) was negligible at all locations. The mean bias and limits of agreement of V-Sign SpO(2ear) and SaO(2), as well as V-Sign pulse rate and the electrocardiogram, were -1.7% and -6.8/+3.9% and 1.2 beats/min and -3.3/+5.8 beats/min. End-expiratory carbon dioxide showed a weak correlation with PaCO(2) (r(2) = 0.47). CONCLUSIONS: Transcutaneous capnometry using the revised V-Sign 2 sensor at the earlobe is a reliable monitoring tool during the recovery period of patients after cardiac surgery. This approach has the potential to reduce the number of arterial blood gas samples.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]