These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Phase-dependent modulation of dorsal root potentials evoked by peripheral nerve stimulation during fictive locomotion in the cat.
    Author: Gossard JP, Rossignol S.
    Journal: Brain Res; 1990 Dec 24; 537(1-2):1-13. PubMed ID: 2085765.
    Abstract:
    To help elucidate the role of presynaptic mechanisms in the control of locomotor movements, the transmission of PAD pathways was investigated by recording dorsal root potentials (DRPs) evoked by electrical stimulation of cutaneous and muscle nerves of both hindlimbs at various phases of the fictive step cycle. Fictive locomotion occurred spontaneously in decorticate cats or by stimulating the mesencephalic locomotor region (MLR) as well as in low spinal cats injected with nialamide and L-DOPA. Evoked DRPs were superimposed on a fluctuating DRP accompanying the fictive locomotor rhythm (locomotor DRP) which typically consisted of two peaks of depolarization per cycle, the largest peak occurring during the flexor phase. The amplitude of evoked DRPs was substantially modulated throughout the locomotor cycle and followed a similar modulation pattern for all stimulated nerves whether ipsilateral (i-) or contralateral (co-). The amplitude of evoked DRPs decreased at the beginning of the flexor phase, dropped to a minimum later in the flexor phase and then increased during the extensor phase where it became maximum. Results were comparable in decorticate and spinal preparations and for L6 and L7 rootlets with cutaneous and muscle nerve stimulation. It is noteworthy that the modulation pattern for a given rootlet was similar for i- and co- stimulation, even though the bilateral locomotor DRPs fluctuate out-of-phase with each other, subjecting the stimulated fibres to opposite presynaptic polarization changes. This suggests that the modulation may depend more on the presynaptic mechanisms of the receiving fibres than on those of the stimulated fibres. These results demonstrate that the transmission in spinal pathways involved in primary afferent depolarization (PAD) is phasically modulated by the activity in the spinal locomotor network. It is further suggested that the presynaptic inhibition associated with PAD evoked by movement-related sensory feedback during real locomotion could be modulated in a similar way.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]