These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Refractive and biometric changes in adolescent guinea pig eyes in development and recover stages of form-deprivation myopia].
    Author: Long KL, Jiang LQ, Li Y, Lü F, Qu J, Zhou XT.
    Journal: Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2010 Jun; 46(6):550-5. PubMed ID: 21055202.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate changes in refraction and vitreous length during form-deprivation and visual re-exposure in guinea pig eyes. METHODS: It was an experimental study. Ninety-six guinea pigs with age of three weeks were randomly divided into form-deprivation and normal control groups (n = 48 in each group). The form-deprivation group was further divided into 4 subgroups (n = 12 in each subgroup) which underwent monocular form-deprivation for 1, 2, 4, and 6 weeks, respectively. At the end of each time point, the form-deprived eyes in all animals were visually re-exposed and followed for 3 (n = 6) and 7 days (n = 6). The control group was also divided into four subgroups (n = 12 in each subgroup) to match the time-points of the form-deprivation group. During form-deprivation and recovery, vitreous length and refraction in each group was measured and compared. RESULTS: There was significant difference in vitreous length (F = 6.108, 28.222, 19.195) and refraction (F = 12.504, 15.003, 6.829) when compared deprived eyes with contralateral eyes 2, 4, or 6 weeks after form-deprivation (P < 0.05). Difference in refraction between deprived eyes and contralateral eyes was -2.36 D, -3.64 D and -3.68 D at 2, 4, 6 week, respectively. Difference in vitreous length was 0.08 mm, 0.19 mm and 0.22 mm. During visual re-exposure, form-deprived eyes changed into hyperopia as compared with contralateral eyes. At day 3 point, there was no significant difference in refraction and vitreous length between form deprived eyes and contralateral eyes in 1 week and 2 weeks groups (F = 0.032, 0.280; P > 0.05). After 7 days recovery, vitreous length and refraction in deprived eyes almost backed to level of contralateral eyes in 1 and 2 weeks groups. At day 3 point, there was significant difference of refraction and vitreous length between form-deprived eyes and contralateral eyes in 4 weeks group and 6 weeks group. After 7 days recovery, there was significant difference in vitreous length for 4 weeks group and there was significant difference in both refraction and vitreous length for 6 weeks group (F = 4.108, 6.317; P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Form-deprivation causes myopic changes in deprived eyes, during visual re-exposure the refraction recovers and the extent depends on the length of form-deprivation. The recovery rate is faster during the first 3 days and then slower after 3 days. The mechanism of form-deprivation myopia in guinea pig eyes is similar to that of myopia in juvenile human beings.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]