These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Cost-effectiveness analysis comparing carboplatin and weekly paclitaxel with cisplatin and docetaxel in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma].
    Author: Inage S, Ise Y, Obayashi M, Katayama S, Gemma A.
    Journal: Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 2010 Nov; 37(11):2093-100. PubMed ID: 21084806.
    Abstract:
    Carboplatin plus weekly paclitaxel (CBDCA/wPTX) and cisplatin plus docetaxel (CDDP/DTX) are the standard regimens used in the first-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC), with no significant difference in efficacy between the two. However, because there has been no study of the cost-effectiveness of CBDCA/wPTX versus CDDP/DTX to data, we compared these two regimens in the present study. Expected costs were calculated based on data from patients with Stage III b/IV NSCLC who were treated with either CBDCA/wPTX or CDDP/DTX in the Nippon Medical School Hospital. Efficacy (1-year survival rate) was determined by pooled analysis of studies extracted from the database. The cost-effectiveness ratio was calculated from expected costs and 1-year survival rates for both the CBDCA/wPTX and CDDP/DTX regimens. The expected costs per patient of the CBDCA/wPTX and CDDP/DTX regimens were ¥2, 847, 514 and ¥3, 513, 195, respectively, with 1-year survival rates of 38.6% and 42.5%, respectively. Thus, the cost-effectiveness ratio for the CBDCA/wPTX and CDDP/DTX regimens is ¥6, 750, 863 and ¥8, 329, 054, respectively. These findings clearly suggest that, CBDCA/wPTX is a more cost-effective regimen than CDDP/DTX.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]