These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Does nonresponse bias the results of retrospective surveys of end-of-life care?
    Author: Casarett D, Smith D, Breslin S, Richardson D.
    Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc; 2010 Dec; 58(12):2381-6. PubMed ID: 21087223.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of nonresponse bias on reports of the quality of end-of-life care that older adults receive. DESIGN: Nationwide retrospective survey of end-of-life care. SETTING: Sixty-two Veterans Affairs Medical Centers. PARTICIPANTS: Patients were eligible if they died in a participating facility. One family member per patient was selected from medical records and invited to participate. MEASUREMENTS: The telephone survey included 14 items describing important aspects of the patient's care in the last month of life. Scores (0-100) reflect the percentage of items for which the family member reported that the patient received the best possible care, and a global item defined the proportion of families who said the patient received "excellent" care. To examine the effect of nonresponse bias, a model was created to predict the likelihood of response based on patient and family characteristics; then this model was used to apply weights that were equivalent to the inverse of the probability of response for that individual. RESULTS: Interviews were completed with family members of 3,897 of 7,110 patients (55%). Once results were weighted to account for nonresponse bias, the change in mean individual scores was 2% of families reporting "excellent" care. Of the 62 facilities in the sample, the scores of only 19 facilities (31%) changed more than 1% in either direction, and only 10 (16%) changed more than 2%. CONCLUSION: Although nonresponse bias is a theoretical concern, it does not appear to have a significant effect on the facility-level results of this retrospective family survey.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]