These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Multi-centre observational study of spurious hyperkalaemia due to EDTA contamination. Author: Cornes MP, Davidson F, Darwin L, Gay C, Redpath M, Waldron JL, Ford C, Gama R. Journal: Clin Lab; 2010; 56(11-12):597-9. PubMed ID: 21141447. Abstract: BACKGROUND: A multi-centre observational study investigating the prevalence of spurious hyperkalaemia due to potassium ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (kEDTA) contamination. METHODS: Serum EDTA was measured in anonymised serum samples with a serum potassium > 6.0 mmol/L collected over a one month period in five different hospital laboratories. Two of the participating laboratories routinely screen all hyperkalaemic samples for EDTA contamination. RESULTS: EDTA contamination was present in 4.1% (range 1.2%-6.7%) of hyperkalaemic samples. In three laboratories, without routine EDTA screening, 50% "EDTA contaminated" were identified by laboratory staff, the remaining 50% samples were undetected and reported as genuine hyperkalaemia. In these laboratories, EDTA was not measurable in 2 samples reported as "EDTA contaminated". CONCLUSIONS: Spurious hyperkalaemia due to kEDTA contamination is relatively common. Education regarding correct blood collection technique offers the best strategy in preventing EDTA sample contamination. Gross kEDTA contamination is easily identified by laboratory staff in samples with marked unexpected hyperkalaemia and hypocalcaemia. Spurious hyperkalaemia due to modest kEDTA contamination may only be confidently detected by measurement of serum EDTA.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]