These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Meta-analysis of the association between VEGF-634 G>C and risk of malignancy based on 23 case-control studies.
    Author: Liu L, Liu L, Zeng F, Wang K, Huang J, Xin L, Zhu PQ.
    Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2011 Jun; 137(6):1027-36. PubMed ID: 21174216.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: The association between polymorphism of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-634 G>C and malignancy risk has been widely studied, and no conclusive result was available up to now. METHODS: Twenty-three case-control studies with 21,917 individuals were included in this meta-analysis through searching the databases of Medline, Embase, and CNKI (up to October 1st, 2010). The odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95%CI) were used to investigate the strength of the association. RESULTS: Overall, the pooled analysis showed that there was no association between VEGF-634 G>C and risk of malignancy, and the ORs (95%CIs) were 0.98 (0.85-1.12) for GG versus CC, 1.03 (0.90-1.17) for GC versus CC, 1.00 (0.89-1.13) for G carrier versus CC, and 1.08 (0.94-1.23) for C carrier versus GG. Subgroup analyses according to ethnicity, source of control, type of cancer, and sample size were also performed, and results indicated that VEGF-634 G>C was not associated with risk of malignancy for neither Asians [1.06 (0.81-1.38) for GG vs. CC and 1.08 (0.84-1.39) for GC vs. CC] nor Caucasians [0.93 (0.83-1.05) for GG vs. CC and 0.98 (0.87-1.10) for GC vs. CC]. It was also not associated with risk of breast cancer [0.95 (0.81-1.12) for GG vs. CC], gastric cancer [0.93 (0.47-1.84) for GG vs. CC], and colorectal cancer [1.17 (0.93-1.47) for GG vs. CC]. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis suggests that VEGF-634 G>C may be not associated with risk of malignancy. More studies with larger sample size were needed to provide more precise evidence.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]