These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: Distribution of genes encoding resistance to macrolides, lincosamides and streptogramins among clinical staphylococcal isolates in a Turkish university hospital.
    Author: Cetin ES, Gunes H, Kaya S, Aridogan BC, Demirci M.
    Journal: J Microbiol Immunol Infect; 2010 Dec; 43(6):524-9. PubMed ID: 21195981.
    Abstract:
    This study investigated the prevalence of genes encoding resistance to macrolides, lincosamides and streptogramins (MLS(B)) among staphylococci in a series of 301 erythromycin-resistant clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS). Erythromycin-resistance phenotypes were determined according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines and specific resistance genes erm(A), erm(B), erm(C), msr(A) and msr(B) were identified using polymerase chain reaction. Two hundred of 301 (66.5%) erythromycin-resistant staphylococcal isolates exhibited resistance to MLS(B) antibiotics. Of these, 127 (63.5%) exhibited a cMLS(B) resistance phenotype (resistant to both erythromycin and clindamycin), whereas 73 (36.5%) expressed the iMLS(B) resistance phenotype (resistant to erythromycin and susceptible to clindamycin). The most prevalent resistance determinants were erm(A) (62%) among S. aureus and erm(C) (30%) among CoNS isolates. Combinations of resistance mechanisms were rarely seen, and occurred most often in oxacillin-resistant isolates. The results of the present study support the idea that there are geographical differences in the prevalence of erythromycin resistance mechanisms among staphylococci, therefore local surveillance studies are important tools for guiding therapy and in the promotion of judicious use of antimicrobial agents.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]