These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Endothelin-1- and isoproterenol-induced differential protein expression and signaling pathway in HL-1 cardiomyocytes. Author: Hong HM, Song EJ, Oh E, Kabir MH, Lee C, Yoo YS. Journal: Proteomics; 2011 Jan; 11(2):283-97. PubMed ID: 21204255. Abstract: It is well known that the two chemical compounds endothelin-1 (ET-1) and isoproterenol (ISO) can individually induce cardiac hypertrophy through G protein-coupled receptors in cardiomyocytes. However, the cardiac hypertrophy signaling pathway activated by ET-1 and ISO is not well defined. Therefore, we investigated the protein expression profile and signaling transduction in HL-l cardiomyocyte cells treated with ET-1 and ISO. Following separation of the cell lysates by using 2-DE and silver staining, we identified 16 protein spots that were differentially expressed as compared to the controls. Of these 16 spots, three changed only after treatment with ET-1, whereas four changed only after treatment with ISO, suggesting that these two stimuli could induce different signaling pathways. In order to reveal the differences between ET-1- and ISO-induced signaling, we studied the different events that occur at each step of the signaling pathways, when selected biocomponents were blocked by inhibitors. Our results indicated that ET-1 and ISO used different pathways for phosphorylation of glycogen synthase kinase-3β (GSK3β). ET-1 mainly used the mitogen-activated protein kinase and phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase/AKT pathways to activate GSK3β, whereas under ISO stimulation, only the phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase/AKT pathway was required to trigger the GSK3β pathway. Furthermore, the strength of the GSK3β signal in ISO-induced cardiac hypertrophy was stronger than that in ET-1-induced cardiac hypertrophy. We found that these two agonists brought about different changes in the protein expression of HL-1 cardiomyocytes through distinct signaling pathways even though the destination of the two signaling pathways was the same.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]