These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty using big-bubble technique for treatment of corneal stromal scars.
    Author: Arslan OS, Ünal M, Tuncer I, Yücel I.
    Journal: Cornea; 2011 Jun; 30(6):629-33. PubMed ID: 21217526.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: To report the clinical outcomes of deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) in patients with anterior corneal stromal scars associated with various etiologies. METHODS: A total of 79 eyes of 79 patients with corneal stromal scars sparing the Descemet membrane and the endothelium underwent DALK by using big-bubble technique. The main outcome measures of the study were the ability to successfully complete DALK, intraoperative and postoperative complications, best spectacle-corrected visual acuity, refraction, and graft clarity. RESULTS: Seventy-two of the surgical procedures were carried out as DALK, and the mean follow-up time was 28.1 ± 17.9 months (range, 12-78 months). The most frequent indication for DALK surgery was postherpetic keratitis (44%). Complete Descemet membrane exposure via big bubble (descemetic DALK) could be achieved in 57 cases (79%). Fifteen eyes (21%) required layer-by-layer manual dissection (predescemetic DALK). Best spectacle-corrected visual acuity of 6/12 or better was present in 59 eyes (82%) postoperatively. The mean spherical equivalent and topographic astigmatism were -3.32 ± 2.13 (range, -9.13 to +4.75) and -2.97 ± 1.94 (range, -8.0 to +4.50) diopter, respectively. There were 2 instances of stromal graft rejection, which responded to medical therapy. CONCLUSIONS: DALK big-bubble technique may be a valuable and safe treatment in patients with corneal stromal scar with healthy endothelium. The visual and refractive outcomes are comparable to standard penetrating keratoplasty, avoiding the risk of endothelial rejection.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]