These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: The role of β-adrenergic receptors in the cardioprotective effects of beta-preconditioning (βPC).
    Author: Salie R, Moolman JA, Lochner A.
    Journal: Cardiovasc Drugs Ther; 2011 Feb; 25(1):31-46. PubMed ID: 21225332.
    Abstract:
    AIM: To determine the mechanism whereby transient stimulation of the β-adrenergic receptor subtypes (β-AR) elicit cardioprotection against subsequent ischaemia. METHODS: Isolated rat hearts were subjected to 35 min regional ischaemia (RI) and reperfusion and infarct size (IS) determined. Hearts were preconditioned with 5 min isoproterenol (β1/β2-AR agonist), denopamine (β1-AR agonist), formoterol hemifumarate (β2-AR agonist) or BRL37344 (β3-AR agonist) and 5 min reperfusion. The roles of the β-ARs, NO, PKA, and PI3-K were explored by using selective antagonists/blockers. Pertussis toxin was administered i.p., 48 h prior to experimentation. RESULTS: IS of hearts preconditioned with either isoproterenol, denopamine or formoterol (% of area at risk: 23.6 ± 1.26; 24.52 ± 0.89; 20.74 ± 0.85 respectively) were significantly smaller than that of non-preconditioned hearts (41.7 ± 1.65) and associated with improvement in postischaemic mechanical performance. The β3-AR agonist BRL37344 could not reduce IS. The β1- and β2-AR blockers CGP-20712A and ICI-118551 abolished the reduction in IS and improvement in mechanical recovery during reperfusion induced by isoproterenol preconditioning, while the β3-AR blocker SR59230A was without effect. Both Rp-8-CPT-cAMPs and wortmannin significantly increased IS when administered before and during β1/β2-AR preconditioning and reduced mechanical recovery. PTX pretreatment had no significant effect on the reduction in IS induced by β1/β2-AR or β2-AR preconditioning, but reduced mechanical recovery in β2-AR preconditioning. Similarly the NOS inhibitors L-NAME and LNNA had no effect on IS in β1/β2-AR preconditioning, but depressed mechanical recovery. CONCLUSION: Protection afforded by β-ARs stimulation, depends on activation of both β1-AR and β2-ARs but not β3-AR. With functional recovery as endpoint, results suggest involvement of NO in β1/β2-AR preconditioning and the Gi protein in β2-AR preconditioning. Both PKA and PI3-K activation were essential for β1/β2-AR cardioprotection.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]