These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Cardiogenic oscillations in He and SF6 expirograms during airway and venous loading. Author: Meyer M, Lewis SM, Mohr M, Schulz H, Schuster KD, Piiper J. Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985); 1990 Sep; 69(3):945-55. PubMed ID: 2123180. Abstract: Cardiogenic oscillations in the expired partial pressure profiles of two inert gases (He and SF6) were monitored in seven anesthetized paralyzed mechanically ventilated dogs. He and SF6 were administered either intravenously by a membrane oxygenator and partial arteriovenous bypass [venous loading (VL)] or by washin into lung gas [airway loading (AL)]. The single-breath expirograms obtained during constant-flow expiration after inspiration of test gas-free air displayed distinct and regular cardiogenic oscillations. The relative oscillation amplitude (ROA), calculated as oscillation amplitude divided by mixed expired-inspired partial pressure difference, was in the range of 1-8%. The ROA for both He and SF6 was approximately 4.2 times higher in VL than in AL, which indicated that among lung units that emptied sequentially in the cardiac cycle, the effects of alveolar ventilation-perfusion (VA/Q) inequality were more pronounced than those of alveolar ventilation-alveolar volume (VA/VA) inequality. In AL, He and SF6 oscillations were 180 degrees out of phase compared with CO2 and O2 oscillations and with He and SF6 oscillations in VL, which suggests that regions with low VA/VA had high VA/Q and very low Q/VA. The ROA was practically unaffected by breath holding in both AL and VL, which indicates that there was little diffusive or convective (cardiogenic) mixing between the lung units that were responsible for cardiogenic oscillations. The ROA was consistently higher for He than for SF6, and the He-to-SF6 ratio was independent of route of test gas loading, averaging 1.6 in both AL and VL. This result may be explained by laminar Taylor dispersion, whereby oscillations generated in peripheral lung regions are dissipated in inverse proportion to diffusion coefficient during transit through the proximal (larger) airways.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]