These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Safety of ivabradine in patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular systolic dysfunction (from the BEAUTIFUL Holter Substudy).
    Author: Tendera M, Talajic M, Robertson M, Tardif JC, Ferrari R, Ford I, Steg PG, Fox K, BEAUTIFUL Investigators.
    Journal: Am J Cardiol; 2011 Mar 15; 107(6):805-11. PubMed ID: 21247517.
    Abstract:
    The BEAUTIFUL Holter substudy explored the cardiac safety of the I(f) inhibitor ivabradine in patients with stable coronary artery disease and left ventricular systolic dysfunction receiving optimal background therapy. The Holter substudy included 840 patients (ivabradine 5 or 7.5 mg/day, n = 421; placebo, n = 419), and the safety set consisted of 807 patients (ivabradine, n = 408; placebo, n = 399). Ambulatory 24-hour electrocardiographic Holter monitoring was performed at baseline and after 1 month and 6 months. There were no relevant between-group differences in baseline characteristics; 93% were receiving concomitant β blocker. Treatment with ivabradine was associated with a decrease in 24-hour heart rate of 6.3 ± 9.5 beats/min at last assessment versus no change with placebo (0.4 ± 7.2 beats/min, p <0.001, between-group difference), with a greater decrease in waking heart rate with ivabradine than during sleep (6.8 ± 10.4 vs 5.2 ± 8.9 beats/min, respectively, at last visit). Incidence of episodes of heart rate <30 beats/min during waking hours or during sleep was ≤1% in the 2 groups. Although there were more patients with heart rates <40 or <50 beats/min with ivabradine than with placebo (awake 12% vs 4% for <40 beats/min and 68% vs 36% for <50 beats/min, respectively; asleep 22% vs 5% for <40 beats/min and 77% vs 50% for <50 beats/min, respectively), there was no between-group difference in episode severity. There was no increase in incidence of conduction and rhythm disturbances. In conclusion, our results confirm that ivabradine significantly lowers heart rate without raising concern for cardiac safety. Our observations strongly support the safety of combining ivabradine with β blockers in patients with coronary artery disease.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]