These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Routine ankle brachial pressure index measurement for peripheral artery disease diagnosis in internal medicine department: Comparison with the recommendations of the Haute Autorité de Santé. Prospective descriptive study about 106 patients].
    Author: Vinit J, Bielefeld P, Muller G, Bonnotte B, Lorcerie B, Besancenot JF, Terriat B.
    Journal: Presse Med; 2011 Apr; 40(4 Pt 1):e163-72. PubMed ID: 21255964.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: The ankle brachial pressure index (ABPI) makes it possible to diagnose peripheral artery disease (PAD) and identify patients with a vascular risk. Recently, the Haute Autorité de santé (HAS) issued guidelines. We wanted to determine the interest and impact of these guidelines when applied to patients hospitalised in an internal medicine department. METHODS: We systematically measured the ABPI in two internal medicine departments. We compared the results obtained with the screening criteria and the good practices recommended by the HAS. RESULTS: The screening criteria recommended by the HAS were already applied in 91% of our 97 patients. PAD was found in 37.1% of patients. In 83% of cases, the diagnosis was unknown (p = 0.02). The PAD was symptomatic in 83% of the known PAD cases, and 3.3% in newly-diagnosed cases (p < 0.001)). The sensitivity of the HAS screening criteria applied to our population was 100% but almost patients justifies ABPI screening. The specificity was 11.5%, the positive predictive value 40% and the negative predictive value 100%. The optimal treatment recommended was implemented in only 50% of patients with known arteriopathy and in 10% of newly-diagnose PAD (p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: PAD prevalence is high in internal medicine department and systematic measurement of ABPI is effective. Determining patients to screen with the HAS criteria has a poor impact in our patients. The optimal treatment is still extremely under-prescribed even in patients with known PAD.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]