These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Comparison of direct planimetry of mitral valve regurgitation orifice area by three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography to effective regurgitant orifice area obtained by proximal flow convergence method and vena contracta area determined by color Doppler echocardiography.
    Author: Altiok E, Hamada S, van Hall S, Hanenberg M, Dohmen G, Almalla M, Grabskaya E, Becker M, Marx N, Hoffmann R.
    Journal: Am J Cardiol; 2011 Feb 01; 107(3):452-8. PubMed ID: 21257014.
    Abstract:
    Direct measurement of anatomic regurgitant orifice area (AROA) by 3-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography was evaluated for analysis of mitral regurgitation (MR) severity. In 72 patients (age 70.6 ± 13.3 years, 37 men) with mild to severe MR, 3-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography and transthoracic color Doppler echocardiography were performed to determine AROA by direct planimetry, effective regurgitant orifice area (EROA) by proximal convergence method, and vena contracta area (VCA) by 2-dimensional color Doppler echocardiography. AROA was measured with commercially available software (QLAB, Philips Medical Systems, Andover, Massachusetts) after adjusting the first and second planes to reveal the smallest orifice in the third plane where planimetry could take place. AROA was classified as circular or noncircular by calculating the ratio of the medial-lateral distance above the anterior-posterior distance (≤1.5 compared to >1.5). AROA determined by direct planimetry was 0.30 ± 0.20 cm², EROA determined by proximal convergence method was 0.30 ± 0.20 cm², and VCA was 0.33 ± 0.23 cm². Correlation between AROA and EROA (r = 0.96, SEE 0.058 cm²) and between AROA and VCA (r = 0.89, SEE 0.105 cm²) was high considering all patients. In patients with a circular regurgitation orifice area (n = 14) the correlation between AROA and EROA was better (r = 0.99, SEE 0.036 cm²) compared to patients with noncircular regurgitation orifice area (n = 58, r = 0.94, SEE 0.061 cm²). Correlation between AROA and EROA was higher in an EROA ≥0.2 cm² (r = 0.95) than in an EROA <0.2 cm² (r = 0.60). In conclusion, direct measurement of MR AROA correlates well with EROA by proximal convergence method and VCA. Agreement between methods is better for patients with a circular regurgitation orifice area than in patients with a noncircular regurgitation orifice area.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]