These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Preliminary experience with external ureteropelvic stent: alternative to double-j stent in laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children. Author: Helmy T, Blanc T, Paye-Jaouen A, El-Ghoneimi A. Journal: J Urol; 2011 Mar; 185(3):1065-9. PubMed ID: 21262512. Abstract: PURPOSE: We assessed whether an external ureteropelvic stent was a feasible and safe alternative to Double-J® stent after laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children, thus avoiding a second general anesthesia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our study included 22 concurrent age matched children who underwent retroperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty between 2000 and 2008. In group 1 an external ureteropelvic stent was inserted through the renal pelvis, then clamped on postoperative day 2. In group 2 a Double-J stent was antegradely inserted. The ureteropelvic stent was removed at the outpatient clinic on day 10, while the Double-J stent was removed under general anesthesia at 1 month. We retrospectively compared operative time, hospital stay, intraoperative and postoperative complications, and followup. RESULTS: Mean±SD age at surgery was 31±9 months in group 1 and 37±12 months in group 2. Mean±SD operative time was slightly shorter in group 1 (190±40 minutes) than in group 2 (205±23 minutes). No intraoperative complications were encountered during placement of stent. Mean±SD hospital stay was 2.18±1.20 days in group 1 and 2.45±0.54 days in group 2. No postoperative complications were reported in group 1. The Double-J stent was noted in the posterior urethra in 1 patient in group 2, requiring cystoscopic repositioning. No patient had urinary tract infection. Median followup was 34 months (range 22 to 56) in group 1 and 35 months (16 to 72) in group 2. CONCLUSIONS: The feasibility of external ureteropelvic stenting after laparoscopic pyeloplasty will pave the way to minimizing the use of Double-J stenting and eliminating a second general anesthesia for catheter removal.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]