These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: 3D fusion of functional cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography coronary angiography: accuracy and added clinical value.
    Author: Donati OF, Alkadhi H, Scheffel H, Kuehnel C, Hennemuth A, Wyss C, Azemaj N, Plass A, Kozerke S, Falk V, Leschka S, Stolzmann P.
    Journal: Invest Radiol; 2011 May; 46(5):331-40. PubMed ID: 21285891.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: To evaluate the accuracy and added diagnostic value of 3-dimensional (3D) image fusion of computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) and functional cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) for assessing hemodynamically relevant coronary artery disease (CAD). METHODS: Twenty-seven patients with significant coronary stenoses on prospectively electrocardiography-gated dual-source CTCA, confirmed by catheter angiography and perfusion defects on CMR at 1.5 T were included. Surface representations and volume-rendered images from 3D-fused CTCA/CMR data were generated using a software prototype. Fusion accuracy was evaluated by calculating surface distances of blood pools and Dice similarity coefficients. Two independent, blinded readers assigned myocardial defects to culprit coronary arteries with side-by side analysis of CTCA and CMR and using fused CTCA/CMR. Added value of fused CTCA/CMR was defined as change in assignment of culprit coronary artery to myocardial defect compared with side-by-side analysis. RESULTS: 3D fusion of CTCA/CMR was feasible and accurate (surface distance of blood pools: 4.1 ± 1.3 mm, range: 2.4-7.1 mm; Dice similarity coefficients: 0.78 ± 0.08, range: 0.51-0.86) in all patients. Side-by-side analysis of CTCA and CMR allowed no assignment of a single culprit artery to a myocardial defect in 6 of 27 (22%) patients. Fused CTCA/CMR allowed further confinement of culprit coronary arteries in 3 of these 6 patients (11%). Myocardial defects were reassigned in 2 of 27 (7%) patients using fused CTCA/CMR, whereas the results remained unchanged in 22 of 27 (81%) patients. Interobserver agreement for assignment of culprit arteries to myocardial defects increased with fused CTCA/CMR (k = 0.66-0.89). CONCLUSION: 3D fusion of low-dose CTCA and functional CMR is feasible and accurate, and adds, at a low radiation dose, diagnostic value for the assessment of hemodynamically relevant CAD as compared with side-by-side analysis alone. This technique can be clinically useful for the following: planning of surgical or interventional procedures in patients having a high prevalence of CAD and for improved topographic assignment of coronary stenoses to corresponding myocardial perfusion defects.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]