These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Third- and fourth-degree perineal lacerations: defining high-risk clinical clusters.
    Author: Hamilton EF, Smith S, Yang L, Warrick P, Ciampi A.
    Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Apr; 204(4):309.e1-6. PubMed ID: 21349493.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: Statistical methods that measure the independent contribution of individual factors for third-/fourth-degree perineal laceration (TFPL) fall short when the clinician is faced with a combination of factors. Our objective was to demonstrate how a statistical technique, classification and regression trees (CART), can identify high-risk clinical clusters. STUDY DESIGN: We performed multivariable logistic regression, and CART analysis on data from 25,150 term vaginal births. RESULTS: Multivariable analyses found strong associations with the use of episiotomy, forceps, vacuum, nulliparity, and birthweight. CART ranked episiotomy, operative delivery, and birthweight as the more discriminating factors and defined distinct risk groups with TFPL rates that ranged from 0-100%. For example, without episiotomy, the rate of TFPL was 2.2%. In the presence of an episiotomy, forceps, and birthweight of >3634 g, the rate of TFPL was 68.9%. CONCLUSION: CART showed that certain combinations held low risk, where as other combinations carried extreme risk, which clarified how choices on delivery options can markedly affect the rate of TFPL for specific mothers.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]