These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: Trends in new injuries, prevalent cases, and aging with spinal cord injury.
    Author: DeVivo MJ, Chen Y.
    Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2011 Mar; 92(3):332-8. PubMed ID: 21353817.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: To determine the characteristics of the newly injured and prevalent population with spinal cord injury (SCI) and assess trends over time. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: SCI Model Systems and Shriners Hospital SCI units. PARTICIPANTS: The study population included people whose injuries occurred from 1935 to 2008 (N=45,442). The prevalent population was estimated based on those who were still alive in 2008. Losses to follow-up (approximately 10%) were excluded from the prevalent population. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Demographic and injury characteristics, mortality, self-reported health, rehospitalization, FIM, Craig Handicap Assessment and Reporting Technique, and the Diener Satisfaction with Life Scale. RESULTS: Mean age at injury increased 9 years since the 1970s. Injuries caused by falls and injuries resulting in high-level tetraplegia and ventilator dependency are increasing, while neurologically complete injuries are decreasing. Discharge to a nursing home is increasing. The mean age of the prevalent population is slightly higher than that of newly injured individuals, and the percentage of incident and prevalent cases older than 60 years is the same (13%). Prevalent cases tend to be less severely injured than incident cases, and less than 5% of prevalent cases reside in nursing homes. Within the prevalent population, life satisfaction and community participation are greater among persons who are at least 30 years postinjury. These findings are a result of very high mortality rates observed after 60 years of age. CONCLUSIONS: Within the prevalent population, the percentage of elderly persons will not increase meaningfully. Those who reach older ages will typically have incomplete and/or lower-level injuries and will have relatively high degrees of independence and overall good health.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]