These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Diagnostic accuracy of urine filtration and dipstick tests for Schistosoma haematobium infection in a lightly infected population of Ghanaian schoolchildren.
    Author: Kosinski KC, Bosompem KM, Stadecker MJ, Wagner AD, Plummer J, Durant JL, Gute DM.
    Journal: Acta Trop; 2011 May; 118(2):123-7. PubMed ID: 21354093.
    Abstract:
    Two screening methods, reagent dipsticks for hematuria and urine filtration for Schistosoma haematobium eggs, were evaluated for their sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing infection with S. haematobium in lightly infected Ghanaian children. Schoolchildren aged 8-18 years (n=255) provided urine samples on three occasions. Overall, 36.4% of girls and 50.7% of boys presented with eggs at least once; 3.3% of girls and 7.5% of boys presented with both eggs and hematuria three times. Many children presented with eggs but without hematuria, or with hematuria but without eggs. When each child was screened three times, the sensitivity of each test method improved by at least 22.9% as compared with single screening, but previously unidentified infections were detected at the third screening, indicating that even three screenings is insufficient. Nearly half of lightly infected children (<50 eggs/10 ml urine, by maximum egg count) were egg-positive during only one of three screenings. Thus, data presented here indicate that when individuals are screened repeatedly, infection status can be assessed more accurately, control programs can be properly evaluated, and population estimates of S. haematobium infection may be made with increased confidence, as compared with single screening.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]