These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Acute ankle sprain: is there a best support?
    Author: O'connor G, Martin AJ.
    Journal: Eur J Emerg Med; 2011 Aug; 18(4):225-30. PubMed ID: 21422934.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: Acute lateral ankle sprain accounts for 85% of all sprains, being generally accepted as the most common sports-related ligamentous injury. There is a lack of consensus about the optimal management of these injuries despite their frequency. The time-honoured mantra of rest, ice, elevation and compression is still commonly used, even though the current evidence for compression is conflicting. METHODS: A prospective randomized controlled clinical trial was carried out in the emergency department of a regional hospital in Ireland to compare outcomes, in terms of ankle function, pain improvement and return-to-work times, in adults presenting within 24 h of first-time acute lateral ankle sprain, among three external supports. RESULTS: We found no statistically significant differences among all three treatments in terms of ankle joint function, using the Karlsson ankle function scale, at 10 or 30-days follow-up. There was a tendency for Elastoplast bandaging to provide better average ankle function at both time points, when compared with double tubigrip and no support. Participants returned to work an average 2 days earlier, if treated with Elastoplast. CONCLUSION: This study found no statistically significant difference in ankle function between double tubigrip bandage, Elastoplast bandage and no support at 10 or 30-days follow-up.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]