These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: 99mTc-MAG3 versus 131I-orthoiodohippurate in the routine determination of effective renal plasma flow.
    Author: Bagni B, Portaluppi F, Montanari L, Prandini N, Zatta G.
    Journal: J Nucl Med Allied Sci; 1990; 34(2):67-70. PubMed ID: 2147211.
    Abstract:
    99mTc-mercaptoacetyltriglycine (MAG3) has been proposed as an alternative to 131I-orthoiodohippurate (OIH) for the scintigraphic determination of effective renal plasma flow (ERPF). The purpose of this study was to compare the ERPF values determined simultaneously with MAG3 and OIH by a dual channel technique in a large group of subjects with widely ranging renal function. During the last two years, we administered a simultaneous injection of 74 MBq of MAG3 and 0.74 MBq of OIH to each subject who underwent a renal scintigraphic study in our hospital. They were 53 females and 50 males (mean age: 52 years; range: 18-70 years), either normal (30) or with a diagnosis of essential hypertension (53), chronic renal failure (14), renal calculi (5), or renal transplant (1). Plasma clearance and ERPF were calculated with both radiocompounds by using the exponential formula of Tauxe and coworkers and a single plasma concentration determination sampled 44 min after injection of the two tracers. The time-activity curves for kidney and blood were of the same bi-exponential type. The mean ratio between the two plasma clearances was 0.49. The linear regression of the ERPF values obtained with the two radiocompounds was highly significant (r = 0.69; p less than 0.0001) and is expressed by the equation: ERPF (MAG3) = 0.453 ERPF (OIH) + 25.7. These data suggest that the routine calculation of ERPF from MAG3 clearance is consistent with the results obtained from OIH clearance. In conclusion, MAG3 appears to be a good predictor of ERPF in routine clinical practice.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]