These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Increased rifampicin resistance in blood isolates of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) amongst patients exposed to rifampicin-containing antituberculous treatment.
    Author: Tan CK, Lai CC, Liao CH, Lin SH, Huang YT, Hsueh PR.
    Journal: Int J Antimicrob Agents; 2011 Jun; 37(6):550-3. PubMed ID: 21482080.
    Abstract:
    The aim of this study was to determine the rifampicin (RIF) resistance rate of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) amongst patients with MRSA bacteraemia who have or have not been exposed to RIF-containing antituberculous (anti-TB) treatment. From 2000 to 2008, patients with MRSA bacteraemia and previous exposure to RIF-containing anti-TB therapy were selected. Patients matched for sex, age and time of culture of MRSA bacteraemia but without exposure to anti-TB therapy were selected as a control group. A total of 139 patients, comprising 49 with RIF exposure and 90 without RIF exposure, were analysed. The RIF resistance rate was higher in patients with previous RIF exposure (61.2% vs. 20.0%; P<0.001). The minimum inhibitory concentration of RIF that inhibited 50% of MRSA isolates (MIC(50)) for the study group was also higher (128 mg/L vs. 0.015 mg/L; P<0.001). The mortality rate was higher in the study group (59.2% vs. 41.1%; P=0.041). MRSA isolates recovered from patients with current usage of a RIF-containing anti-TB regimen were more likely to be resistant to RIF (87.5% vs. 36%; P=0.001), with higher MIC(50) values (256 mg/L vs. 1mg/L; P=0.002), and resulted in a higher mortality rate than isolates from patients with remote usage of an anti-TB regimen (79.2% vs. 40%; P=0.005). Multivariate analysis showed that current anti-TB drug usage was the only risk factor for RIF resistance [odds ratio (OR)=7.457, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.581-35.167] and mortality (OR=7.201, 95% CI 1.583-32.766). Given the high rate of RIF resistance in patients with prior anti-TB treatment, RIF susceptibility testing should be performed before considering combination treatment of RIF in MRSA infection.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]