These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Diagnosis of recent primary rubella virus infections: significance of glycoprotein-based IgM serology, IgG avidity and immunoblot analysis.
    Author: Wandinger KP, Saschenbrecker S, Steinhagen K, Scheper T, Meyer W, Bartelt U, Enders G.
    Journal: J Virol Methods; 2011 Jun; 174(1-2):85-93. PubMed ID: 21513745.
    Abstract:
    Reliable serodiagnosis of rubella virus (RV) infections requires discrimination of specific IgM induced by primary rubella from persistent, reactivated or non-specific IgM reactivity. Sera from 130 pregnant women with recent or past RV infection/vaccination, persistent IgM or negative rubella serology, 26 patients with other acute infections and 5 patients with rheumatoid factor-positivity were analyzed for RV-specific IgM by ELISA coated with whole-virus lysate or native glycoprotein, followed by determination of IgG avidity and E2-specific IgG using lysate-coated ELISA and non-reducing immunoblot. Compared to a reference μ-capture IgM ELISA, the sensitivity for diagnosing recent rubella infection/vaccination was 90.0% and 100% for the lysate-based and glycoprotein-based IgM ELISA, respectively. With respect to women with past RV infections or negative histories of RV infection/vaccination, both assays were 97.5-100% specific, whereas for patients with other acute infections the glycoprotein substrate provided a specificity of 92.3% compared to only 80.8% using whole-virus antigen. Analyzing anti-RV IgG avidity and anti-E2 IgG reactivity allowed the time point of primary infection to be determined unambiguously in >86% of samples. In conclusion, using RV glycoprotein antigen improves the specificity of indirect IgM ELISA. In cases of RV-specific IgM reactivity, recent primary rubella infection can be confirmed or excluded efficiently by specific IgG avidity and immunoblot analysis.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]