These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: F wave to height or limb length ratios as rational alternatives for F wave latency in clinical electrodiagnostic medicine.
    Author: Mahmoudi H, Salehi Z, Azma K, Rezasoltani Z, Omidzohour M.
    Journal: Clin Neurophysiol; 2011 Nov; 122(11):2300-4. PubMed ID: 21530387.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: To delineate the F wave latency/height (F min/He) or F wave latency/limb length (F min/L) ratio as a more useful alternative for the currently reported shortest latency in milliseconds. METHODS: One hundred and sixty-six healthy volunteers, 85 upper limbs and 84 lower limbs entered the study. Minimum F wave latencies were determined in median, ulnar, tibial and peroneal nerves. The F min/He and F min/L ratios of each nerve were calculated. RESULTS: F latencies of all nerves had significant correlation with height and limb length but there was no correlation between either F min/He or F min/L and height in any nerve except for peroneal F min/He (p = 0.04, r = 0.23). CONCLUSIONS: Using the F min/He or F min/L ratios are more accurate than reporting only the F wave minimum latency, since these ratios incorporate corrections for height and/or limb length. This method also eliminates the false positive and negative reports caused by using a single reference table for all heights. SIGNIFICANCE: A unique reference table can be produced using the F min/He or F min/L for all populations and races, so that the comparison between different population samples can be done easily. Also data of different investigations can be pooled together for meta-analysis purposes when a single reference table is used for different samples.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]