These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Interlaboratory comparison of K-ras testing by real-time PCR and RFLP in colorectal cancer samples.
    Author: Lanthaler AJ, Spizzo G, Mitterer M, Mian C, Mazzoleni G.
    Journal: Diagn Mol Pathol; 2011 Jun; 20(2):90-3. PubMed ID: 21532493.
    Abstract:
    Activating mutations of K-ras have been described in approximately 40% of patients with colorectal cancer, and are associated with resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor-targeted antibodies, such as cetuximab and panitumumab. Cost-effective and easy methods to determine K-ras mutations are urgently needed. Samples from 31 patients were tested. In laboratory 1, a real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based technique was used. All samples (n=31) were additionally tested using a restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis in laboratory 2. All results were confirmed by direct sequencing. In the first run, a concordance of real-time PCR and RFLP was observed in 77.4% (24 of 31) of samples. After resampling and reevaluation, a concordance of 93.5% (30 of 31) could be achieved. One of 7 (6.5%) initial discordant cases showed a mutation using real-time PCR and no mutation using RFLP, but the mutation was confirmed by direct sequencing. Real-time PCR and RFLP can be considered as valid K-ras mutation detection techniques. However, in patient probes with lower amounts of tumor cells and wild-type K-ras, reanalysis of further tumor tissue is recommended.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]