These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Coronary CT angiography in step-and-shoot technique with 256-slice CT: impact of the field of view on image quality, craniocaudal coverage, and radiation exposure.
    Author: Muenzel D, Noel PB, Dorn F, Dobritz M, Rummeny EJ, Huber A.
    Journal: Eur J Radiol; 2012 Jul; 81(7):1562-8. PubMed ID: 21561732.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of a small field of view (FOV) for step-and-shoot coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) on craniocaudal z-coverage per scan step, image quality, and radiation exposure. METHODS: 53 patients underwent prospectively ECG-gated CCTA on a 256-slice MDCT scanner using either a FOV > 250 mm (group 1, n = 29) or a FOV ≤ 250 mm (group 2, n = 24). Craniocaudal z-coverage was determined on coronal multiplanar reformations. Image noise, signal-to-noise ratio, contrast-to-noise ratio, and qualitative image parameters were assessed. Radiation dose was estimated from the dose length product and was standardized for a scan range from the main pulmonary artery to the diaphragm in order to make both groups comparable. RESULTS: Diagnostic image quality was achieved in 91.3% of the coronary artery segments of group 1 and 89.9% in group 2 (p = 0.201). There were no major differences in image noise, SNR, and CNR between both groups. A smaller FOV leads to an increase of craniocaudal coverage of a single CT scan step (r = -0.879; p ≤ 0.001). There was an increase of 23.8% of the mean z-coverage per scanned subvolume in group 2 (59.9 mm vs. 48.8mm). Radiation dose was significantly lower in group 2 (229 vs. 285 mGy cm, respectively). CONCLUSION: The use of a small transverse FOV for step-and-shoot CCTA at a wide detector CT scanner leads to an increased z-coverage. 2 scan volumes are enough to image the cardiac anatomy. Radiation dose is decreased without negative impact on image quality.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]