These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: A 'new' method to normalise exercise intensity.
    Author: Lansley KE, Dimenna FJ, Bailey SJ, Jones AM.
    Journal: Int J Sports Med; 2011 Jul; 32(7):535-41. PubMed ID: 21563028.
    Abstract:
    Exercise intensity has traditionally been described, prescribed and normalised as a fraction (%) of the maximal oxygen uptake ( V˙O (2max)). We hypothesised that the extent of inter-subject variability in the physiological responses to exercise would be greater when work rates were prescribed using % V˙O (2max) as compared to % 'delta' (Δ), a method of normalising exercise intensity in which both the gas exchange threshold (GET) and the V˙O (2max) are considered. 9 men completed a ramp incremental test on a cycle ergometer to establish the GET and V˙O (2max). Subsequently, subjects completed 6 constant-work-rate exercise bouts at intensities corresponding to: 50%, 70% and 90% V˙O (2max); and 60% GET, 40% Δ (that is, 40% of the difference between the GET and V˙O (2max)) and 80% Δ. For all bouts, exercise was continued for 20 min or until task failure if this occurred sooner. When exercise was prescribed using the % Δ concept, there were significant reductions in the inter-subject variability in pulmonary gas exchange, blood lactate accumulation, heart rate, and ratings of perceived exertion (all P < 0.05). In conclusion, the % Δ concept resulted in more consistent inter-subject physiological responses to constant-work-rate exercise and should be used in preference to % V˙O (2max) to more effectively normalise exercise intensity.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]