These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: An evaluation of the method used in digestibility estimations of a dietary ingredient and comparisons on external and internal markers, and time of faeces collection in digestibility studies in the fish Oreochromis aureus (Steindachner).
    Author: De Silva SS, Shim KF, Khim Ong A.
    Journal: Reprod Nutr Dev; 1990; 30(2):215-26. PubMed ID: 2161667.
    Abstract:
    Results of experiments carried out on the tilapiine fish Oreochromis aureus (Steindachner) to evaluate the method used in the determination of the apparent dry matter and nutrient digestibilities of an ingredient, together with validity of estimations based on day and night collection of faeces, and internal and external markers, are presented. The apparent dry matter and protein digestibilities of the test diets were linearly correlated to the percent substitution of the test ingredient, percent fibre and ash in the test diets (P less than 0.05); the correlation coefficient for the individual relationships decreased in that order. Dry matter or protein digestibilities were not correlated to the dietary protein content (P greater than 0.05). Similarly there were no statistical differences between digestibility estimations based on faecal material, voided in the day or the night; and estimated using different markers viz crude fibre and Cr2O3. The apparent dry matter and protein digestibilities of the test ingredients, leaf meal, were curvilinearly related to the percent substitution of the ingredient in the test diets. The ingredient digestibilities estimated, using crude fibre as the marker, were consistently higher than those estimated with Cr2O3 (P less than 0.05). The present study suggests that, for ingredient digestibility estimations, test diets prepared by mixing 15-20% of the ingredient to a reference diet would be more desirable.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]