These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Detection and peripheral or central localization of sensory pathway involvement of the lower limbs by somatosensory evoked potentials].
    Author: Meunier S, Le Canuet P, Laffont F, Serdaru M, Soisson T, Cathala HP.
    Journal: Rev Neurol (Paris); 1990; 146(4):271-82. PubMed ID: 2163094.
    Abstract:
    In the presence of more or less atypical sensory or sensorimotor symptoms the questions that arise most frequently concern the authenticity of the disorders and the precise level of the lesion. In this study, somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) to stimulation of the tibial nerve at the ankle were recorded at different levels in 35 healthy subjects and 32 patients with sensory disorders. Recording electrodes were placed at the popliteal fossa (peripheral sensory nerve conduction velocity), at the T12-L1 level (medullary potential: N21) and at the vertex (P40 wave). The spine to cortex time interval was measured. A systematic study of evoked responses to median nerve stimulation was performed. The 32 patients were divided into 4 groups: Group I (3 cases) had slowed sensory conduction velocity (SCV), similar delay in N21 latency and normal N21-P40: peripheral neuropathy. Group II (4 cases) had normal SCV, delayed N21 latency and normal N21-P40: radicular or conus medullaris injury. Group III (19 cases) had normal SCV, normal N21 latency and lengthened N21-P40 interval. A study of responses to median nerve stimulation made it possible to discriminate between spinal and cortical or subcortical impairment. Group IV (6 cases) had abnormalities from any two of the three groups defined above. In 24 out of 32 patients (75 p. 100), further investigations (myelography, MRI, EMG) confirmed the localization determined by evoked responses. In the other 8 patients (25 p. 100) whose clinical picture suggested a medullary or radicular impairment, SEPs alone clearly revealed an injury. SEPs can distinctly show a spinal impairment and determine the choice of further investigations.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]