These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Efficacy of CT screening for lung cancer in never-smokers: analysis of Japanese cases detected using a low-dose CT screen.
    Author: Kondo R, Yoshida K, Kawakami S, Shiina T, Kurai M, Takasuna K, Yamamoto H, Koizumi T, Honda T, Kubo K.
    Journal: Lung Cancer; 2011 Dec; 74(3):426-32. PubMed ID: 21663997.
    Abstract:
    CT-screening for lung cancer is fairly widely used for both smokers and never-smokers in East Asia because the mortality rate for never-smokers due to this cancer is relatively high in this region. We performed comparative analyses, as a retrospective study, on three lung cancer arms detected by CT-screen, X-ray-screen, and via analysis of clinicopathological features and outcomes in never-smokers from a symptomatic-prompted group of patients. The total study cohort comprised 218 patients in CT group, 160 in X-ray group, and 82 in symptomatic-prompted group. The percentage of bronchioloalveolar carcinoma (BAC) was 65.1% in CT-screen group. The ratio of stage IA tumors in CT-screen group was 88.5% and the ratio of advanced cases (i.e. stages IIIB+IV) was 2.3%. The 5-year-survival rates were 95.0% in CT-screen, 73.0% in X-ray-screen and 40.0% in symptomatic-prompted group. We performed further sub-analysis which excluded pure BACs (i.e. Noguchi types A and B) or pure GGOs within a 10mm diameter because this is indicative of a very favorable prognosis. Based on this sub-analysis the number of the subjects in each group became 76 in CT group; 140 in X-ray group and 77 in symptomatic-prompted group. The principal characteristics of the patients such as age and sex became almost even in the three arms. In CT-screen subgroup, the ratio of stage IA cancer was 69.7% and of advanced cases was 6.6%. This advanced ratio was lower than both X-ray-screen (22.1%) and symptomatic-prompted (61.9%) groups. The 5-year-survival rates were 89.9% among CT-screen group patients, 72.6% for X-ray screen cases and 39.1% in symptomatic-prompted group. A CT-screen was found to be one of the independent prognostic factors for lung cancer (HR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.12-0.72) and based on this would be expected to reduce the risk of lung cancer death by 78% compared with non-screened cases. In conclusion, CT will improve the survival rate and decrease the rate of advanced cancers in never-smokers via the existing annual screening system. CT-screening is also an independent prognostic improvement factor in never-smokers, and will therefore reduce the risk of lung cancer death.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]